Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: error message when subscription target is a partitioned table
Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Arkhena <Arkhena@gmail.com>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-01-11T01:50:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2019/01/10 19:27, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:58:10PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: >> The reason I started this thread is due to this Stack Overflow question: >> >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53554727/logical-replication-and-declarative-partitioning-in-postgresql-11 >> >> So, it appears that there may be an element of surprise involved in >> encountering such an error (despite the documentation). > > Improving the user experience is definitely a good thing in my > opinion because the current error message can be confusing, so you > were right to start this thread. Still I don't agree that classifying > those relkinds as not supported is right either for consistency with > the code existing for two years and for the way the code is designed > to work as rows are replicated on a per-physically-defined relation > basis. Okay, I withdraw my objection to the wording proposed by you. Thanks, Amit
Commits
-
Improve error messages for incorrect types of logical replication targets
- 373bda61d2d6 12.0 landed