Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com>
From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>,
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@enterprisedb.com>,
Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-04-24T22:59:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v2-0001-Flesh-out-docs-for-the-prefix-make-variable.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v2-0001
On Mar 19, 2025, at 13:29, David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> wrote: > I think this should at least be documented, but generally feels unexpected to me. I’ve attached a patch that fleshes out the docs, along with an example of setting `extension_control_path` and `dynamic_library_path` to use the locations. It might not have the information right about the need for “postgresql” or “pgsql” in the path. Back in 2003[1] it was just “postgres”, but I couldn’t find the logic for it just now. Here’s a rebase. Best, David
Commits
-
doc: Flesh out extension docs for the "prefix" make variable
- 0064020680c1 18.0 landed
-
Fix extension control path tests
- b7076c1e7f43 18.0 landed
-
extension_control_path
- 4f7f7b037585 18.0 landed