Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> Walsender doesn't need the periodic wakeups anymore, thanks to
> the latch feature. So wal_sender_delay is basically useless now.
> How about dropping wal_sender_delay or increasing the default
> value?

If we don't need it, we should remove it.

			regards, tom lane