Horton

Re: plpython vs _POSIX_C_SOURCE

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Date: 2023-01-25T04:37:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Patches attached.

+1 for 0001.  I'm still nervous about 0002.  However, maybe the
cases that we had trouble with are legacy issues that nobody cares
about anymore in 2023.  We can always look for another answer if
we get complaints, I guess.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. plpython: Avoid the need to redefine *printf macros

  2. plpython: Stop undefining _POSIX_C_SOURCE, _XOPEN_SOURCE