Horton

Re: Naming of network_ops vs. inet_ops for SP-GIST

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: greenreaper@hotmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-01-25T03:38:28Z
Lists: pgsql-docs 
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> I don't have a strong opinion about the naming inconsistency between
> the opclass name and the opfamily name in this case, though, couldn't
> it create more problems than actually fix something?

Well, it's been like that from day one and people haven't complained.
I think changing it now would add more confusion than it subtracts.

> Anyway, attached is a patch for the docs.  Thoughts?

Works for me.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. doc: Fix network_ops -> inet_ops in SpGiST operator class list

  2. doc: Rework tables for built-in operator classes of index AMs