Re: pgindent run?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-03-22T14:56:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes:
> cvs annotate is a really, really handy tool, unfortunetly these
> indent runs remove this very useful tool as well as do a major job
> of obfuscating the code changes.

I think this is a good reason for *not* applying pgindent on an
incremental basis, but only once per release cycle.  That at least
lets cvs annotate be useful within a cycle.

			regards, tom lane