Re: pgindent run?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-03-22T14:56:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes: > cvs annotate is a really, really handy tool, unfortunetly these > indent runs remove this very useful tool as well as do a major job > of obfuscating the code changes. I think this is a good reason for *not* applying pgindent on an incremental basis, but only once per release cycle. That at least lets cvs annotate be useful within a cycle. regards, tom lane