Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2010-01-26T14:40:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> *That* makes pg_standby obsolete, not streaming replication per se.
>> Setting standby_mode=on, with a valid restore_command using e.g 'cp' and
>> no connection info for walreceiver is more or less the same as using
>> pg_standby.

> I've yet to understand how the files in the archive get from the master
> to the slave in this case, or are you supposing in your example that the
> cp in the restore_command is targetting a shared disk setup or
> something?

pg_standby didn't address that detail, either.

			regards, tom lane