Thread
-
Buglet?
Christopher Sawtell <csawtell@xtra.co.nz> — 2001-03-08T06:16:20Z
chris=# select *, array_element_count(pupils_on_leave) as number_awol_pupils from absence ; date | lesson_number | pupils_on_leave | pupils_awol | number_awol_pupils ------------------------+---------------+-----------------+---------------+-------------------- 2001-03-08 00:00:00+13 | 25 | | {4,29,3} | 2001-03-08 00:00:00+13 | 26 | | {17,27,28,14} | 2001-03-08 00:00:00+13 | 27 | | {5,24,13} | 2001-03-08 00:00:00+13 | 12 | {12,34} | {23} | 2 2001-03-07 00:00:00+13 | 21 | | {4,5,28,15} | (5 rows) As expected. chris=# update absence set pupils_on_leave[1]=9 where lesson_number=21; UPDATE 1 Now I tell pg to insert a value in the array, & he says he's done it. chris=# select *, array_element_count(pupils_on_leave) as number_awol_pupils from absence ; date | lesson_number | pupils_on_leave | pupils_awol | number_awol_pupils ------------------------+---------------+-----------------+---------------+-------------------- 2001-03-08 00:00:00+13 | 25 | | {4,29,3} | 2001-03-08 00:00:00+13 | 26 | | {17,27,28,14} | 2001-03-08 00:00:00+13 | 27 | | {5,24,13} | 2001-03-08 00:00:00+13 | 12 | {12,34} | {23} | 2 2001-03-07 00:00:00+13 | 21 | | {4,5,28,15} | (5 rows) But he has told me a fat fib. chris=# \d absence Table "absence" Attribute | Type | Modifier -----------------+--------------------------+---------- date | timestamp with time zone | lesson_number | integer | pupils_on_leave | integer[] | pupils_awol | integer[] | It that a bug? It would be very nice for me if that worked. ( you have to put '{}' in the array field before usisng the field[n]=x notation. ) -- Sincerely etc., NAME Christopher Sawtell CELL PHONE 021 257 4451 ICQ UIN 45863470 EMAIL csawtell @ xtra . co . nz CNOTES ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/languages/C/tutorials/sawtell_C.tar.gz -->> Please refrain from using HTML or WORD attachments in e-mails to me <<-- -
Re: Buglet?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2001-03-08T15:44:37Z
Christopher Sawtell <csawtell@xtra.co.nz> writes: > It that a bug? You could argue that. The handling of NULL arrays (not to mention NULLs in arrays) is pretty brain-d^H^H^H^H^H^Hsimplistic; I don't think the original designer thought about NULLs at all. All of the array code could use an overhaul, actually, to move it out of the student-project category and into the professional-tool category. I've taken occasional swipes at it over the past couple of years, but it still leaves a lot to be desired. Any volunteers out there? regards, tom lane