Re: Postgresql "FIFO" Tables, How-To ?

Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> writes:
> But isn't that exactly the problem? Once the sequence wraps around how do I 
> know that id=1 is actually later then id=2 without a date column?

If you use an int8 sequence column, I doubt you need to worry about
wraparound.  A date column probably hasn't got enough resolution,
so the other workable approach is to use a timestamp column.  Ends up
costing 8 bytes either way.

			regards, tom lane