Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDED for range partition b
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-09-12T15:37:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: >> Did anything happen on this, or did we just forget it completely? > I forgot it. :-( > I really think we should fix this. +1. You've got the rest of the week ... regards, tom lane
Commits
-
After a MINVALUE/MAXVALUE bound, allow only more of the same.
- e8b65986ba0d 10.0 landed
- 9361f6f54e3f 11.0 landed
-
Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDED for range partition bounds.
- d363d42bb9a4 10.0 cited