Re: Add primary keys to system catalogs
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-02-02T10:37:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2021-02-01 15:24, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 2021-01-30 22:56, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Hmm, shouldn't there have been a catversion bump in there? > >> I suppose yes on the grounds that it introduces something new in a >> freshly initdb-ed database. But I thought it wasn't necessary because >> there is no dependency between the binaries and the on-disk state. > > I've generally worked on the theory that a catversion bump is indicated > if you need to initdb in order to pass the updated regression tests. > Which one did in this case. Yeah, that's a good way of looking at it. I'll keep that in mind. -- Peter Eisentraut 2ndQuadrant, an EDB company https://www.2ndquadrant.com/
Commits
-
Add primary keys and unique constraints to system catalogs
- dfb75e478cac 14.0 landed