Re: Emacs vs pg_indent's weird indentation for function declarations
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Piotr Stefaniak <postgres@piotr-stefaniak.me>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Date: 2019-05-19T18:13:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Piotr Stefaniak <postgres@piotr-stefaniak.me> writes: > On 19/05/2019 19.27, Tom Lane wrote: >> Piotr Stefaniak <postgres@piotr-stefaniak.me> writes: >>> I think it's safe to assume that upstream can drop support for K&R-style >>> parameters altogether. >> Cool. I already created the switch, but maybe we could have it >> default to -nkr? > Sorry, but GNU indent already uses -kr for something else and I would > like FreeBSD indent have something like that under the same name. > Besides, indent has too many options and this one doesn't look like > particularly desired by anyone. It's possible that someone will complain > some day, but I don't think we should assume that they'll do or that > they're more important than the other users who benefit from your change > being the default behavior and no additional options. Huh. OK, I'll rip the switch back out again. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Phase 2 pgindent run for v12.
- 8255c7a5eeba 12.0 landed
-
ANSI-ify a few straggler K&R-style function definitions.
- da71f98efba9 12.0 landed