Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
Kumar, Sachin <ssetiya@amazon.com>
From: "Kumar, Sachin" <ssetiya@amazon.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>, "Andrew
Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Robins
Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-12-07T14:05:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I have updated the patch to use heuristic, During pg_upgrade we count > Large objects per database. During pg_restore execution if db large_objects > count is greater than LARGE_OBJECTS_THRESOLD (1k) we will use > --restore-blob-batch-size. I think both SECTION_DATA and SECTION_POST_DATA can be parallelized by pg_restore, So instead of storing large objects in heuristics, we can store SECTION_DATA + SECTION_POST_DATA. Regards Sachin
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Count individual SQL commands in pg_restore's --transaction-size mode.
- 81db073a2878 17.0 landed
- 0f1290521504 18.0 landed
-
Reduce number of commands dumpTableSchema emits for binary upgrade.
- b3f0e0503f33 18.0 landed
- 2fa989e6a340 17.0 landed
-
Invent --transaction-size option for pg_restore.
- 959b38d770ba 17.0 landed
-
Rearrange pg_dump's handling of large objects for better efficiency.
- a45c78e3284b 17.0 landed
-
Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints
- 46a0cd4cefb4 17.0 cited
-
Fix typo and case in messages
- 7d7ef075d2b3 17.0 cited