Horton

Re: Draft release notes complete

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-05-10T20:16:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Expose track_iotiming information via pg_stat_statements.

  2. Rewrite GiST support code for rangetypes.

  3. Clean up a couple of box gist helper functions.

  4. Replace the "New Linear" GiST split algorithm for boxes and points with a

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Well, that would be fine, too.  What I think is bizarre is that I got
> credit for some things I was barely involved in (like SP-gist) and no
> credit for other things I spent a LOT of time on (like security views
> and some of KaiGai's other stuff), and similarly for other people.
> Similarly, some things I am credited on involve very significant
> contributions from other people and others are cases where I did
> nearly all the work.  I think it's weird to lump all those cases
> together without any distinction.

Well, you know, these are *draft* release notes.  Feel free to correct
them anywhere you believe they are inaccurate.

I think the bigger issue here is that we don't seem to have consensus
about whether to include reviewers' names.  Bruce evidently thinks
that's a good idea, else he wouldn't have done it, but I only recall one
other person speaking in favor of it.  Everybody else seems to think
that it'll be too verbose.

			regards, tom lane