Re: BUG #16840: Rows not found in table partitioned by hash when not all partitions exists
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: michalalbrycht@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2021-01-27T18:08:34Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> CREATE TABLE dir (
> id SERIAL,
> volume_id BIGINT,
> path TEXT
> ) PARTITION BY HASH (volume_id);
> CREATE TABLE dir_part_2 PARTITION OF dir FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3,
> remainder 2);
> SELECT * FROM dir WHERE volume_id=1 AND (path='abc' OR path='def') --
> returns 0 rows - NOT OK!
Hmm, seems to be a case of faulty partition exclusion, because the
plan isn't scanning anything:
=# explain SELECT * FROM dir WHERE volume_id=1 AND (path='abc' OR path='def');
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------
Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
One-Time Filter: false
(2 rows)
Probably the reason we'd not noticed is that an incomplete set of
hash partitions isn't a very useful situation: if you don't
populate all of the partitions, you risk unexpected insertion
failures, since you really shouldn't be assuming which partition
any given key value will map into. Still, it's clearly a bug.
Thanks for the report!
regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Fix hash partition pruning with asymmetric partition sets.
- 7f1921cb9228 13.2 landed
- 7c53a80675df 12.6 landed
- 6f94531b0cf8 11.11 landed
- 1d9351a87c9a 14.0 landed