Re: [REVIEW] prepare plans of embedded sql on function start
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
Cc: Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, pavel.stehule@gmail.com
Date: 2011-09-10T22:59:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> writes: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 01:21, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'm not that happy with overloading the ANALYZE keyword to mean this >> But we could certainly use some other name --- I'm >> inclined to suggest CHECK: >> CHECK FUNCTION function_name(arglist); > Just a thought: pg_check_function(oid)? >> People would want some sort of wild card capability; at the very least >> "check all plpgsql functions owned by me". > SELECT pg_check_function(p.oid) FROM pg_proc p > JOIN pg_user ON (usesysid=proowner) WHERE usename=current_user; Hmm, there's something in what you say --- it gets us out from under the need to anticipate what wildcard rules people would want. I think it loses something in ease-of-use, but we could have the utility command too for the simple check-one-function case, and direct people to the function as soon as they want something fancier. What about check-strength options? regards, tom lane