Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-09T14:59:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Pavan Deolasee > <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I am wondering if we shouldn't be asking ourselves a different >>> question: why is ANALYZE running long enough on your tables for this >>> to become an issue? How long is it taking? >> The log file attached in the first post has the details; it's taking around 5 mins for the accounts table with 50 scale factor and 50 clients > Wow, that's slow. Still, what if the user were doing a transaction of > comparable size? It's not like ANALYZE is doing a gigantic amount of > work. I wonder what vacuum cost delay settings are in use ... regards, tom lane