Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-09T14:59:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Pavan Deolasee
> <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I am wondering if we shouldn't be asking ourselves a different
>>> question: why is ANALYZE running long enough on your tables for this
>>> to become an issue? How long is it taking?

>> The log file attached in the first post has the details; it's taking around 5 mins for the accounts table with 50 scale factor and 50 clients

> Wow, that's slow.  Still, what if the user were doing a transaction of
> comparable size?  It's not like ANALYZE is doing a gigantic amount of
> work.

I wonder what vacuum cost delay settings are in use ...

			regards, tom lane