Thread

1. Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error

   Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 1999-05-12T14:12:18Z

   Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
   > Tom, I like your fix in configure.in better than adding a silly
   > Makefile rule.  Yours is much cleaner.  You just created an
   > expanded_libdir in configure.in and let that be expanded in the *.in
   > files.
   
   Not really --- did you see what I had to do to get the thing expanded
   properly?  Ick...  Brook's approach would be cleaner.  But I don't want
   to spend more time on it now.
   
   			regards, tom lane
   
   

2. Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error

   Jan Wieck <jwieck@debis.com> — 1999-05-12T15:03:36Z

   >
   > Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
   > > Tom, I like your fix in configure.in better than adding a silly
   > > Makefile rule.  Yours is much cleaner.  You just created an
   > > expanded_libdir in configure.in and let that be expanded in the *.in
   > > files.
   >
   > Not really --- did you see what I had to do to get the thing expanded
   > properly?  Ick...  Brook's approach would be cleaner.  But I don't want
   > to spend more time on it now.
   
       And it's not required for PL/pgSQL or PL/Tcl any more. initdb
       now installs them in template1 (if their shared  objects  are
       installed  in  the  libdir),  so we can remove the mklang.sql
       scripts.  So concentrate on your other items.
   
   
   Jan
   
   --
   
   #======================================================================#
   # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
   # Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
   #======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #