Horton

Re: Instability of partition_prune regression test results

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-09-28T17:34:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 12:59 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Isn't the point of using ANALYZE here to show that the exec-param
>>> based run-time pruning is working (those "never executed" strings)?

>> Hm.  Well, if you want to see those, we could do it as attached.

> Perfect, thanks.

OK, pushed that way.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Rely on plan_cache_mode to force generic plans in partition_prune test.

  2. Improve stability of partition_prune regression test.