Re: Enabling Checksums
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-11-14T20:06:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Regarding checksums, I can add an option for the initdb that the > buildfarm script runs. We already run different tests for different > encodings. Of course, constant expanding like this won't scale, so we > need to pick the options we want to exrecise carefully. I thought the whole point of the buildfarm was to provide a scalable way of exercising different combinations of options that individual developers couldn't practically test. We might need a little more coordination among buildfarm owners to ensure we get full coverage, of course. regards, tom lane