Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-02-10T16:50:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- fix-partition-dependencies-2.patch (text/x-diff) patch
I wrote: > Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes: >>> [ invent separate primary and secondary partition dependencies? ] >> I lean towards changing these on HEAD, ... > Me too. Here's a version of the patch that does it that way. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Redesign the partition dependency mechanism.
- 1d92a0c9f7dd 12.0 landed
-
Fix trigger drop procedure
- cc126b45ea5c 11.2 landed
- cb90de1aac18 12.0 landed
-
Sort the dependent objects before recursing in findDependentObjects().
- f1ad067fc3ae 12.0 landed
-
Avoid sometimes printing both tables and their columns in DROP CASCADE.
- 9194c4270b28 12.0 landed