Re: PROPERTY GRAPH pg_dump ACL minimization

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2026-06-30T03:11:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> Most of the patch bulk (modest as it is) exists to keep support for dumping
> from beta1.  I'm not sure whether it was worth bothering.  Breaking dump from
> a beta is without precedent known to me, so I just erred on the side of not
> breaking it.  If we were to decide pg_dump could drop support for betas, I'd
> be fine with that.

> This entails a catversion bump on the v19 branch.

Those points are not unrelated.  If you bump catversion then beta
testers must use pg_upgrade to get from beta1 to beta2, so you should
not drop support for dumping from beta1.

I could agree with dropping that support after beta2, though.  That'd
imply having to update via beta2 to beta3 or later, but I doubt those
hardy enough to test beta1 would have a problem with that.

> If the master branch
> already has a post-branch catversion bump by then, the two catversions should
> remain distinct.  I'll use yyyymmdd1 for v19 and yyyymmdd2 for master.

Check.

(I didn't read the patch, just responded to your commentary.)

			regards, tom lane