Re: PROPERTY GRAPH pg_dump ACL minimization
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2026-06-30T03:11:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes: > Most of the patch bulk (modest as it is) exists to keep support for dumping > from beta1. I'm not sure whether it was worth bothering. Breaking dump from > a beta is without precedent known to me, so I just erred on the side of not > breaking it. If we were to decide pg_dump could drop support for betas, I'd > be fine with that. > This entails a catversion bump on the v19 branch. Those points are not unrelated. If you bump catversion then beta testers must use pg_upgrade to get from beta1 to beta2, so you should not drop support for dumping from beta1. I could agree with dropping that support after beta2, though. That'd imply having to update via beta2 to beta3 or later, but I doubt those hardy enough to test beta1 would have a problem with that. > If the master branch > already has a post-branch catversion bump by then, the two catversions should > remain distinct. I'll use yyyymmdd1 for v19 and yyyymmdd2 for master. Check. (I didn't read the patch, just responded to your commentary.) regards, tom lane