Re: Optimize LISTEN/NOTIFY

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
Cc: Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-10-07T16:51:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Optimize LISTEN/NOTIFY via shared channel map and direct advancement.

  2. Fix incorrect logic for caching ResultRelInfos for triggers

Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com> writes:
> 7. I'm wondering if we could add some TAP tests for this?

async.c seems already moderately well covered by existing tests
src/test/regress/sql/async.sql
src/test/isolation/specs/async-notify.spec

Do we need more?  If there's something not covered, can we extend
those test cases instead of spinning up a whole new installation
for a TAP test?

Also, I don't think it's the job of this patch to provide test
coverage for dshash.  That should be quite well covered already.

			regards, tom lane