Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-09-15T21:52:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes: > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 14:42 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: >> operator constraints >> operator exclusion constraints >> operator conflict constraints >> conflict operator constraints >> operator index constraints >> index constraints >> generalized index constraints >> something else? > Just to add a couple more permutations of Robert Haas's suggestions: > exclusion operator constraints > exclusive operator constraints To my ear, "operator exclusion constraints" or "exclusive operator constraints" seem reasonable; the other permutations of that phrase simply aren't good English. I'm not tremendously happy with any of them though... regards, tom lane