Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension

--On 17. September 2009 23:00:12 +0300 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> 
wrote:

> f the name is a problem, why not change the name?  What you are
> proposing above is effectively a very elaborate name change, so why not
> go for a simpler one?

I don't like the solution by using -o "<initdb options>" to push down 
command line options to initdb. I always had the opinion that this was (and 
is) a valid workaround for postgres itself, but it doesn't feel correct to 
expose that further to initdb and its purposes.

My 2 cents...

-- 
Thanks

	Bernd