Re: Questions about indexes?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Ryan Bradetich <rbradetich@uswest.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-02-17T06:34:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Ryan Bradetich <rbradetich@uswest.net> writes: > Although the table schema is immaterial, I will provide it so we have a > common framework for this discussion: > host_id integer (not null) > timestamp datetime (not null) > category text (not null) [<= 5 chars] > anomaly text (not null) [<= 1024 chars] > This table is used to store archived data, so each row in the table must > be unique. Currently I am using a primary key across each column to > enforce this uniqueness. It's not real clear to me why you bother enforcing a constraint that the complete row be unique. Wouldn't a useful constraint be that the first three columns be unique? Even if that's not correct, what's wrong with tolerating a few duplicates? You can't tell me it's to save on storage ;-) > I am not sure why all the data is duplicated in the index ... but i bet > it has to do with performance since it would save a lookup in the main > table. An index that can't prevent looking into the main table wouldn't be worth anything AFAICS ... regards, tom lane