Horton

Re: reorganizing partitioning code

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-03-21T17:33:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> David Steele wrote:
>> Are you planning to update this patch?  If not, I think it should be
>> marked as Returned with Feedback and submitted to the next CF once it
>> has been updated.

> This is no new development, only code movement.  I think it would be
> worse to have three different branches of partitioning code, v10
> "basic", v11 "powerful but not reorganized", v12 "reorganized".  I'd
> rather have only v10 "basic" and v11+ "powerful".

> Let's keep this entry open till the last minute.  

Nonetheless, it's March 21.  David's point is that it's time to get a
move on.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Reorganize partitioning code