Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]

Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>

From: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133@gmail.com>, Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu@gmail.com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>
Date: 2026-03-26T09:51:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:

> On 2026-Mar-25, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla wrote:
> 
> > Then as suggested by Alvaro off-list I checked the lock upgrade
> > behavior during the table swap phase. I observed that if another
> > transaction holds a conflicting lock on the table when the swap is
> > attempted, it can lead to “transient table” data loss during a manual
> > or timeout abort.  when a REPACK (concurrent) waits for a conflicting
> > lock to be released and eventually hits a lock_timeout (or is
> > cancelled via ctrl+c), the transaction aborts. During this abort, the
> > cleanup process triggers smgrDoPendingDeletes. This results in the
> > removal of all transient table relfiles and decoder worker files
> > created during the process.  This effectively wipes out the work done
> > by the transient table creation before the swap could successfully
> > complete, this happens because during transient table creation we add
> > the table to the PendingRelDelete list.
> 
> I think we certainly need to make the files be deleted in some
> reasonable fashion if repack fails partway through.

I think that Srinath tries to explain the cleanup in detail, but in fact
that's a normal processing of transaction abort. Not sure we need to do
anything special.

> As for lock upgrade, I wonder if the best way to handle this isn't to
> hack the deadlock detector so that it causes any *other* process to die,
> if they detect that they would block on REPACK.  Arguably there's
> nothing that you can do to a table while its undergoing REPACK
> CONCURRENTLY; any alterations would have to wait until the repacking is
> compelted.  We can implement that idea simply enough, as shown in this
> crude prototype.  (I omitted the last three patches in the series, and
> squashed my proposed changes into 0003, as announced in my previous
> posting.)

I haven't thought of it because I'm not familiar with the deadlock detector,
but what you do seems consistent with the way blocking by autovacuum is
handled.

The only problem I noticed is that PROC_IN_CONCURRENT_REPACK is not cleared at
the end of transaction. Perhaps it should be added to PROC_VACUUM_STATE_MASK
(name of which is already misleading due to the presence of PROC_IN_SAFE_IC,
but that's another problem).

> The isolation test file is also a bit crude; I just copied repack.spec
> to a new file and removed the uninteresting bits.

Maybe just add a new permutation to repack.spec? I don't remembery if I
created repack_toast.spec as a separate file just for better readability or if
there was some other issue, but the deadlock test might fit into repack.spec.

-- 
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Allow old WAL recycling during REPACK CONCURRENTLY

  2. Advance restart_lsn more eagerly in LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation

  3. Remove unnecessary signal handler change

  4. Improve REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) error messages some more

  5. Revert "Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific"

  6. Move REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) test out of stock regression tests

  7. REPACK: do not require REPLICATION or LOGIN

  8. Add missing initialization

  9. Simplify declaration of memcpy target

  10. Reserve replication slots specifically for REPACK

  11. doc: Add an example of REPACK (CONCURRENTLY)

  12. Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific

  13. Avoid different-size pointer-to-integer cast

  14. Fix valgrind failure

  15. Add CONCURRENTLY option to REPACK

  16. Rename cluster.c to repack.c (and corresponding .h)

  17. Allow index_create to suppress index_build progress reporting

  18. Make index_concurrently_create_copy more general

  19. Document the 'command' column of pg_stat_progress_repack

  20. Introduce the REPACK command

  21. Toggle logical decoding dynamically based on logical slot presence.

  22. Split vacuumdb to create vacuuming.c/h

  23. Remove ReorderBufferTupleBuf structure.

  24. Revert changes to CONCURRENTLY that "sped up" Xmin advance

  25. VACUUM: ignore indexing operations with CONCURRENTLY