Re: Binary in/out for aclitem
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Radosław Smogura <rsmogura@softperience.eu>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-22T22:24:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > On 02/22/2011 05:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think this one has got far less use-case than the other, and I don't >> want to expose the internal representation of ACLITEM to the world. > The sendv for enums sends the label, and ISTR there are some others that > send the text representation also. Would that be better? It'd be more future-proof than this patch, but I'm still unconvinced about the use-case. regards, tom lane