Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>,
Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-02-27T15:22:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Is there an argument for back-patching this? > I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take your > comment as a vote that we should back-patch it? Yeah, I'd vote for it. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Back-patch checkpoint clarification docs and pg_basebackup updates
- bd34e7f19b40 9.4.12 landed
- 2843d5d657be 9.5.7 landed
- b88b929a7071 9.6.3 landed