Re: jsonpath versus NaN

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>

Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2020-07-11T17:46:37Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 4:04 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I understand both patches as fixes and propose to backpatch them to 12
>> if no objections.

> Both patches are pushed.

Thanks for taking care of that!

			regards, tom lane

Commits

Forbid numeric NaN in jsonpath
- f4ae676e3178 12.4 landed
- 89a0b1a7ca0a 13.0 landed
- df646509f371 14.0 landed
Improve error reporting for jsonpath .double() method
- 3ec5f6b53dfb 12.4 landed
- b9a04a9bc665 13.0 landed
- 065718116746 14.0 landed
Partial implementation of SQL/JSON path language
- 72b6460336e8 12.0 cited