Re: TopoSort() fix
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
Rui Hai Jiang <ruihaij@gmail.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-29T14:56:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 08:24:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think this is a sufficiently obvious bug, and a sufficiently >> obvious fix, that we should just fix it and not insist on getting >> a reproducible test case first. I think a test case would soon >> bit-rot anyway, and no longer exercise the problem. >> I certainly do *not* want to wait so long that we miss the >> upcoming minor releases. > +1. Any volunteers? If Robert doesn't weigh in pretty soon, I'll take responsibility for it. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Add an isolation test to exercise parallel-worker deadlock resolution.
- da9456d22a76 13.0 landed
-
Mark advisory-lock functions as parallel restricted, not parallel unsafe.
- 4886da832750 13.0 landed
-
Fix busted logic for parallel lock grouping in TopoSort().
- d933816c04c6 12.0 landed
- c3b613e1b0e5 9.6.15 landed
- af41ab50fdc5 10.10 landed
- 3420851a2c2d 13.0 landed
- 0dcb1c6c4874 11.5 landed