Re: speed up a logical replica setup
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
pg_createsubscriber: Remove obsolete comment
- 71795d1cb41b 17.0 landed
- 1330843bb78e 18.0 landed
-
pg_createsubscriber: Fix an unpredictable recovery wait time.
- e5ba6a5ab62c 17.0 landed
- 03b08c8f5f3e 18.0 landed
-
Fix unstable test in 040_pg_createsubscriber.
- ae4e072bad5f 17.0 landed
- 9fd8b331dfe1 18.0 landed
-
Fix the testcase introduced in commit 81d20fbf7a.
- ae395f0f7edb 18.0 landed
- 14387ab06503 17.0 landed
-
Further weaken new pg_createsubscriber test on Windows.
- 55c309fc5b08 17.0 landed
- a1333ec048fb 18.0 landed
-
Temporarily(?) weaken new pg_createsubscriber test on Windows.
- 54508209178b 17.0 landed
-
Make pg_createsubscriber warn if publisher has two-phase commit enabled.
- 917754557cc0 17.0 landed
-
Make pg_createsubscriber more wary about quoting connection parameters.
- b3f5ccebd79d 17.0 landed
-
pg_createsubscriber: Remove failover replication slots on subscriber
- 81d20fbf7a03 17.0 landed
-
pg_createsubscriber: Remove replication slot check on primary
- b96391382626 17.0 landed
-
pg_createsubscriber: Only --recovery-timeout controls the end of recovery process
- 04c8634c0c4d 17.0 landed
-
pg_createsubscriber: creates a new logical replica from a standby server
- d44032d01463 17.0 landed
-
Add some const decorations
- 48018f1d8c12 17.0 landed
-
Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()
- ff9e1e764fcc 17.0 cited
-
Remove MSVC scripts
- 1301c80b2167 17.0 cited
Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> writes: > As a recent buildfarm failure [1] shows, that test addition introduced > new instability: I have a different but possibly-related complaint: why is 040_pg_createsubscriber.pl so miserably slow? On my machine it runs for a bit over 19 seconds, which seems completely out of line (for comparison, 010_pg_basebackup.pl takes 6 seconds, and the other test scripts in this directory take much less). It looks like most of the blame falls on this step: [12:47:22.292](14.534s) ok 28 - run pg_createsubscriber on node S AFAICS the amount of data being replicated is completely trivial, so that it doesn't make any sense for this to take so long --- and if it does, that suggests that this tool will be impossibly slow for production use. But I suspect there is a logic flaw causing this. Speculating wildly, perhaps that is related to the failure Alexander spotted? regards, tom lane