Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-11-05T14:56:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove unnecessary use of trigger flag to hash plperl functions
- 2d01ec0708d5 9.1.0 cited
=?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= <wulczer@wulczer.org> writes: > PS: I'm wondering if there's any noticable slowdown from always starting > a subxact before doing SPI. Plperl users seemed not to notice, so I > guess I shouldn't worry. It's not cheap :-( ... but it's *necessary*. There's no other way to get sane behavior. If the cost annoys you, you should put some effort into making subxact start/stop cheaper overall, rather than trying to avoid having one here. regards, tom lane