Re: ALTER TABLE...ALTER COLUMN vs inheritance
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-16T18:45:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Catalog NOT NULL constraints
- e056c557aef4 16.0 landed
Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> writes: > FYI defaults have the same problem. Would it be awkward would it be > to use pg_constraint for the book keeping as well? [ and by that I > really mean ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT my_default DEFAULT .... so you > can give them a name ] That sounds moderately insane to me. Why would you need a name? What would it mean to have more than one default attached to a column? regards, tom lane