Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-09-06T21:31:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Another thing that could raise eyebrows is that I chose to remove the > "missing_ok" argument from get_role_oid_or_public, so it's not a perfect > mirror of it. None of the current callers need it, but perhaps people > would like these functions to be consistent. Well, it can't be really consistent anyway: if you did have a missing_ok argument then you'd need an unusual return convention so you could distinguish "missing" from "public". As long as this is a static function I don't see a strong need for it to mimic the API of the general get_whatever_oid functions. regards, tom lane