Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>, Jordan Gigov <coladict@gmail.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-08-03T21:37:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de> writes:
> Am Donnerstag, den 27.07.2017, 15:52 -0400 schrieb Tom Lane:
>> So I'm thinking we should consider the multi-pass patch I posted as
>> a short-term, backpatchable workaround, which we could hope to
>> replace with dependency logic later.

> +1, it would be really nice if this could be fixed in the back-branches 
> before v11.

Done.

			regards, tom lane


Commits

  1. Fix pg_dump/pg_restore to emit REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW commands last.