Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>,
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>, Jordan Gigov <coladict@gmail.com>,
Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-08-03T21:37:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de> writes: > Am Donnerstag, den 27.07.2017, 15:52 -0400 schrieb Tom Lane: >> So I'm thinking we should consider the multi-pass patch I posted as >> a short-term, backpatchable workaround, which we could hope to >> replace with dependency logic later. > +1, it would be really nice if this could be fixed in the back-branches > before v11. Done. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Fix pg_dump/pg_restore to emit REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW commands last.
- b93217653b68 9.4.13 landed
- 65048cf23dba 9.5.8 landed
- 3d76328298ca 9.6.4 landed
- 3eb9a5e7c4c9 10.0 landed
- 035bb82222bc 9.3.18 landed