Re: Cancelling idle in transaction state
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, James Pye <lists@jwp.name>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-12-06T15:23:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 07:58 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: >> Thanks. Looks like good input. With the further clarification that we >> use NOTIFY it seems a solution is forming. > If we use notify, then "the sufficiently smart client" (tm) should > probably declared that it is waiting for such notify , no ? We are using NOTICE, not NOTIFY, assuming that we use anything at all (which I still regard as unnecessary). Please stop injecting confusion into the discussion. regards, tom lane