Re: proposal: additional error fields

Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> There is another advantage to doing this within the core system that I
> have not touched upon, which is that in this way we can expose another
> useful GUC to reduce log noise, beyond log_min_messages.

Yeah, that one is actually a pretty compelling argument.  A *lot* of
people would like to have a setting for "log only non-routine errors",
I think.

			regards, tom lane