Re: git: uh-oh

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Max Bowsher <maxb@f2s.com>, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-09-07T22:52:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Hmm.  Some further looking in the git log output shows that that
> "manufactured commit" is actually the ONLY commit shown as being a
> predecessor of REL8_4_3.  Everything else after 8.4.2 was tagged is
> shown as reached from refs/tags/REL8_4_4.  This is at the least pretty
> weird, and I have to suppose it's the manufactured commit causing it.
> It does appear to agree with your explanation: the "8.4.3" state is
> not part of the branch's main evolution, but is a little side branch
> all by itself.

This same pattern can be found repeated in at least ten earlier places
in our project history, btw --- just look for commits using the phrase
"manufactured by cvs2svn to create tag" instead of "to create branch".
The worst example is probably the one for tag REL7_1_BETA, which deletes
70-odd files.

			regards, tom lane