Re: Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-03-05T13:38:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2/4/19 4:21 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:08:03PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> maybe "supertype". It is one char shorter .. somewhere is term >> "supperclass, ..." >> >> In Czech language this term is short, "nadtyp", but probably it is not >> acceptable :) > > Moved to next CF. This thread has been very quiet for a month. I agree with Andres [1] that we should push this to PG13. -- -David david@pgmasters.net [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/raw/20190214203752.t4hl574k6jlu4t25%40alap3.anarazel.de
Commits
-
Introduce "anycompatible" family of polymorphic types.
- 24e2885ee304 13.0 landed
-
Refactor our checks for valid function and aggregate signatures.
- e6c178b5b73a 13.0 landed
-
Rearrange pseudotypes.c to get rid of duplicative code.
- 87c9c2571c81 13.0 landed