Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-02-18T01:32:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> * Fix large object support in pg_dump.  I think this is just waiting
>> for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct.  I've been
>> meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
>> someone else would like to take a look?  This is an open item, so we
>> should really try to deal with it.

> Yeah, I think this is a "must fix for alpha" item.  Will look at it
> tomorrow, god willin an the creek don't rise (or, given the weather
> around here: the power stays on).

I've applied that patch after some revisions.

The only thing still showing as open in the CommitFest webpage is
the last plperl patch.  I think that's actually done but not marked
as committed; Andrew?

			regards, tom lane