Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-09-01T19:06:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 02:43:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm inclined to think that the "no sockdir" case is broken and you >> should get rid of it. If you're starting a postmaster, you can and >> should tell it a sockdir, period. If you're running a live check this >> code is all moot anyway. > I don't think you understand. The "no sockdir" case is only for live > checks of pre-9.1 old servers, because we can't find the socket > directory being used. Everything else uses the local directory for the > socket. If we remove that case, we can't do live checks on pre-9.1 > servers. If it's a live check, then (a) you aren't restarting the postmaster, and (b) you wouldn't want to lock out TCP anyway. So adding --listen-addresses to the string seems pointless and/or wrong. regards, tom lane