Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning work
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-03-29T06:05:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Do we know in the optimizer whether we will be needing cheapest startup > or not? No. Higher levels might want either. > Is the middle one kept because the optimizer has to mix the startup plus > some percentage of the total cost for queries using LIMIT? Right. There are potentially some ranges of LIMIT for which it could win, I believe. Maybe with some math you could prove there is no range in which the other two don't dominate it, but I suspect the extra logic would slow down add_path more than it's worth. regards, tom lane