Re: [HACKERS] Re: 7.1 docs
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: lockhart@fourpalms.org, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-03-24T16:32:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-docs
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > All functions are documented (for appropriate values of "all") in the > User's Guide, chapter 4. There was probably once the idea of setting up a > reference page set for the functions, but I don't know if this is > particularly better than what we have now. In fact, I would argue it's > worse. A "page per function" approach is clearly overkill for the vast majority of our functions. I think that's not unrelated to the fact that no one's ever bothered to prepare such documentation ;-) On the other hand, the existing layout of the User's Guide encourages a "line per function" approach, which is insufficient for at least some functions. We've worked around that by adding paragraphs below the main table on each page, but that seems a little awkward in many cases. A reference section in the style of typical Unix section-3 man pages (multiple related functions per page, with text discussion and examples) would be a useful compromise, maybe. Needs more thought. regards, tom lane