Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Eric Ridge <eebbrr@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Regina Obe <lr@pcorp.us>,
strk@kbt.io,
Regina Obe <r@pcorp.us>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-05-01T20:24:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Eric Ridge <eebbrr@gmail.com> writes: > FWIW, outside of major ZDB releases, most of those have little-to-zero schema changes. But that doesn't negate the fact each release needs its own upgrade.sql script. I'm working on a point release right this moment and it won't have any schema changes but it'll have an upgrade.sql script. Hmm ... our model for the in-core extensions has always been that you don't need a new upgrade script unless the SQL declarations change. Admittedly, that means that the script version number isn't a real helpful guide to which version of the .so you're dealing with. We expect the .so's own minor version number to suffice for that, but I realize that that might not be the most user-friendly answer. regards, tom lane