Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: "David Fetter" <david@fetter.org>, "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "PostgreSQL JDBC List" <pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-10-11T14:17:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote: >> Please find enclosed a WIP patch from one of my co-workers >> intended to support JDBC's setQueryTimeout, along with the patch >> for JDBC that uses it. > I agree that it would be very nice to support this JDBC feature, but > I'm not clear on why this can't be done with just JDBC changes using > the java.util.Timer class and the existing Statement.cancel() > method. Can you explain why the backend needed to be touched? ... and, if you are seriously expecting to have that happen, why the patch was submitted to pgsql-jdbc not pgsql-hackers? I hadn't even read it because I assumed it was strictly a JDBC change. regards, tom lane