Re: New gist vacuum.
x4mmm@yandex-team.ru
From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michail Nikolaev <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-03-02T17:00:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> 2 марта 2018 г., в 21:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> написал(а): > > Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> writes: >> So, I agree, unconditional counting is a good idea. Here's the v3 patch. > > Pushed with trivial cosmetic adjustments. > > I've marked the CF entry as committed; please make a new CF entry in > 2018-09 for the other patch. I'd also suggest starting a new email > thread for that. Linking the CF entry to a years-old thread doesn't > make it easy for people to find what's the current submission. Thanks, Tom! Yes, I'll definitely start new thread for that patch. This thread had split unexpectedly, and I see it's not a convenient way. I've learned no to do it this way anymore :) Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
Commits
-
Make gistvacuumcleanup() count the actual number of index tuples.
- ccd650430db6 10.4 landed
- 947f06c6224e 9.4.18 landed
- 81b9b5ce490a 11.0 landed
- 6b56f07525a0 9.3.23 landed
- 529137cac9a8 9.6.9 landed
- 46d98da43e56 9.5.13 landed