Re: New gist vacuum.

x4mmm@yandex-team.ru

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michail Nikolaev <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-03-02T17:00:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 2 марта 2018 г., в 21:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> написал(а):
> 
> Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> writes:
>> So, I agree, unconditional counting is a good idea. Here's the v3 patch.
> 
> Pushed with trivial cosmetic adjustments.
> 
> I've marked the CF entry as committed; please make a new CF entry in
> 2018-09 for the other patch.  I'd also suggest starting a new email
> thread for that.  Linking the CF entry to a years-old thread doesn't
> make it easy for people to find what's the current submission.

Thanks, Tom!

Yes, I'll definitely start new thread for that patch. This thread had split unexpectedly, and I see it's not a convenient way. I've learned no to do it this way anymore :)

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Commits

  1. Make gistvacuumcleanup() count the actual number of index tuples.