Re: [JDBC] JDBC connections to 9.1

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>, Steve Singer <ssinger@ca.afilias.info>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-04-18T15:25:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com> writes:
> On 18/04/11 15:57, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I am --- when I redid the GUC assign_hook logic a few weeks ago,
>> I changed the client_encoding code so that it shows the normalized
>> (official) name of the encoding, not whatever random string the client
>> sent over.  For instance, previous versions:

> Am I right in thinking that would be that change committed on the 7th 
> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2011-04/msg00039.php) ? 

Yes, that one.

> What concerns me 
> most is that (assuming my dates are right) the JDBC driver has been 
> broken for 11 days and no one noticed. This would lead me to believe 
> that there is no JDBC build server. What would it take to set one up?

+1 for doing something along that line.

			regards, tom lane