Re: pg_rawdump
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>, Roberto Mello <roberto.mello@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-10-21T14:11:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl> writes: > Robert Haas wrote: >> and break on-disk compatibility just to make it easier to > If it's inserted in the "special" area, it will not break any > compatibility. I'll tell you what I really don't like about this proposal: we discuss some scheme or other for taking over the "special space" in heap pages at least once a year. None of them have been particularly compelling so far, but one may come along that is; especially given that we're now trying to maintain on-disk compatibility across versions. So I think the opportunity cost of assigning a use to that space is mighty high. I don't find this idea important enough to justify foreclosing future uses for the special space. The real bottom line is this: if you care enough about your data to be willing to expend a large amount of effort on manual recovery attempts, why didn't you have a decent backup scheme in place? There are way too many scenarios where you'll have no hope of doing any such manual recovery anyway. regards, tom lane